No Fault Defender – A Defense Attorney's Perspective on New York No-Fault Law
By: Jason Tenenbaum
Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the late submission of its bill
January 25th, 2010 | Author: JT
Synergy First Med. PLLC v ELRAC Inc, 2010 NY Slip Op 50048(U)(App. Term 1st Dept. 2009).
I missed this case, although it was pretty well discussed here and here.
Posted in Timely submissions of Bills
Leave a Reply
Categories
Contact Jason Tenenbaum
(516)750-0595 (T)
(516)414-2869 (F)
Jason@jtnylaw.com
Our No-Fault Practice
I believe that what makes our law firm stand out from every other defense firm is the precision of our motion and appellate work, as well as our overall case handling. My track record at the appellate courts and motion courts may be found in the "About JT" tool bar. If you want a properly drafted appellate brief or a properly handled case from inception to conclusion at a reasonable price, send me an email or give me a telephone call.
My Law Firm
Recent Comments
- JT on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- raymond Zuppa on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- JT on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- raymond zuppa on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- SunTzu on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- JT on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- Raymond Zuppa on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- JT on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- Raymond Zuppa on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
- slick on The Munnelly letter – The proper reimbursement for MUA services
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
Categories
- 5102(d) issues (13)
- Additional Verification (10)
- Arbitrations (9)
- Article 75 (7)
- Attorney fee (2)
- Bad Faith (2)
- Calendar Control (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Coverage (29)
- Damages (1)
- interest (1)
- Deductible issues (1)
- Defamation (1)
- Defaults (12)
- 3215(f) issues (2)
- Adjournments (2)
- Claims office failure (3)
- Law Office Failure (3)
- Discontinuances (1)
- Discovery (20)
- Bill of Particulars issues (1)
- Discovery sanctions (6)
- EBT issues (10)
- HIPPA issues (1)
- Notice of Trial issues (1)
- Spoliation (1)
- DWI issues (1)
- EUO issues (10)
- Evidence (54)
- 4404(a) & weight of evidence review (2)
- Business records (16)
- collateral estoppel (4)
- Expert journals and treatises (3)
- Experts (19)
- Hearsay (16)
- Fee Schedule (15)
- Florida issues (2)
- Fraud (2)
- General non-cooperation (1)
- IME issues (6)
- Jury Issues (1)
- Mailing (7)
- Mallela issues (9)
- Medical Necessity (44)
- Non receipt of bill (1)
- Pleadings (3)
- Amendments (3)
- Preservation of defenses on NF-10 (8)
- Prima Facie case (20)
- Priority of Payment (1)
- Procedural Issues (62)
- 2106 and 2309 (10)
- Affidavits (1)
- Consolidation (2)
- Counterclaims (1)
- Declaratory Judgment Action (1)
- Deposition transcripts (1)
- Directed Verdicts (1)
- Hypo-technical defects (8)
- Judgments (1)
- Pleading defects (2)
- Renew and reargue (6)
- Replies (3)
- Res Judicata (4)
- Stipulations (1)
- Striking Notices of Trial (3)
- Summary Judgment Issues (12)
- Severence (2)
- Standing (13)
- Statute of Limitations (3)
- Statutory interest (3)
- Timely notice of claim (1)
- Timely submissions of Bills (5)
- Uncategorized (45)
- Workers Compensation (7)