2309 yet again – from the Appellate Division, Second Department

Betz v Daniel Conti, Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 00086 (2d Dept. 2010)

“Although the affidavit of the defendants’ expert, which was notarized outside the state, failed to conform to the requirements set forth in CPLR 2309(c), contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, such defect was not fatal, as the plaintiff was not prejudiced thereby ( see CPLR 2001; Smith v. Allstate Ins. Co., 38 AD3d 522; see also Falah v. Stop & Shop Cos., Inc., 41 AD3d 638).

I am trying to find out if the plaintiff in his opposition papers objected to Defendant’s violation of CPLR 2309(c).  I checked the court’s website to see if the underlying order was available online, either in .html or .pdf format.  Much to my dismay, it is nowhere to be found.  Would someone who appears in Supreme Suffolk or Suffolk County Court be willing to pull this order and email it to me?  The index # is:  17202/06.  If there is no mention in the order as to whether Plaintiff objected to the improper attestation, would you be able to go through plaintiff’s opposition papers to see if he objected?

Leave a Reply

Categories
Contact Jason Tenenbaum
(516)750-0595 (T) (516)414-2869 (F) Jason@jtnylaw.com
Bookmark and Share
Our No-Fault Practice
I believe that what makes our law firm stand out from every other defense firm is the precision of our motion and appellate work, as well as our overall case handling. My track record at the appellate courts and motion courts may be found in the "About JT" tool bar. If you want a properly drafted appellate brief or a properly handled case from inception to conclusion at a reasonable price, send me an email or give me a telephone call.
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories