The First Department’s newest inconsistent position on 2309

Green v Fairway Operating Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 03481 (1st Dept. 2010)

“The affidavit of plaintiff’s witness, purportedly sworn to in the Dominican Republic, lacks the certificate of conformity (Real Property Law § 301-a) required by CPLR 2309(c), and therefore is not properly before the Court (see Matter of Elizabeth R.E. v Doundley A.E., 44 AD3d 332 [2007]).”

There is no set rule regarding the consequence for failing to obtain a certificate of conformity.  It seems to be up to the panel at the appropriate appellate court to determine, ad hoc, whether the affidavit will be accepted.  Sometimes the defect is excusable, sometimes it is not.  Sometimes the defect may be cured later on, sometimes it may not.  I cannot give an accurate description of the law on this topic.  All I can say is that make sure you obtain a certficiate of conformity for out of state affidavits.  There is no reason to be stuck playing Russian roulette, in determining whether the affidavit, at the end of the day, will be accepted.

One Response to “The First Department’s newest inconsistent position on 2309”

Leave a Reply

Categories
Contact Jason Tenenbaum
(516)750-0595 (T) (516)414-2869 (F) Jason@jtnylaw.com
Bookmark and Share
Our No-Fault Practice
I believe that what makes our law firm stand out from every other defense firm is the precision of our motion and appellate work, as well as our overall case handling. My track record at the appellate courts and motion courts may be found in the "About JT" tool bar. If you want a properly drafted appellate brief or a properly handled case from inception to conclusion at a reasonable price, send me an email or give me a telephone call.
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Categories